<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 680 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385912</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed by the CIT(A) under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for concealment of income, non-disclosure of capital gains from property sale, and unexplained credit entries in the bank account. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed as voluntary disclosure post-detection does not absolve from penalty, indicating an intention to evade tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:08:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 680 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385912</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed by the CIT(A) under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for concealment of income, non-disclosure of capital gains from property sale, and unexplained credit entries in the bank account. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed as voluntary disclosure post-detection does not absolve from penalty, indicating an intention to evade tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>