https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283270 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant on grounds of tax laws, CBDT instructions, business activities, legal precedents, and disallowance of excessive payments to related parties under section 40A(2)(b). The decision was based on the appellant's arguments against double taxation, prioritizing firm-level assessments, taxation of profits, treatment of JVs, and interpretation of section 40A(2)(b) regarding disallowances. en-us Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:02:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283270 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant on grounds of tax laws, CBDT instructions, business activities, legal precedents, and disallowance of excessive payments to related parties under section 40A(2)(b). The decision was based on the appellant's arguments against double taxation, prioritizing firm-level assessments, taxation of profits, treatment of JVs, and interpretation of section 40A(2)(b) regarding disallowances. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283270