https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385909 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a SEZ unit, in an appeal against the rejection of MEIS export incentives due to non-declaration in Shipping Bills. The Tribunal held that the denial of the amendment was not legally sustainable, emphasizing the appellant's compliance with MEIS requirements and the justification for amending Shipping Bills based on relevant legal decisions. It considered the absence of physical examination requirements for SEZ exports during the relevant period and the control of SEZ operations by the Development Commissioner and Customs officers, directing the respondent to make the necessary amendments in the Shipping Bills. en-us Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385909 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a SEZ unit, in an appeal against the rejection of MEIS export incentives due to non-declaration in Shipping Bills. The Tribunal held that the denial of the amendment was not legally sustainable, emphasizing the appellant's compliance with MEIS requirements and the justification for amending Shipping Bills based on relevant legal decisions. It considered the absence of physical examination requirements for SEZ exports during the relevant period and the control of SEZ operations by the Development Commissioner and Customs officers, directing the respondent to make the necessary amendments in the Shipping Bills. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385909