<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1357 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283269</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties under section 271(1)(c) in a case involving various disallowances. The penalties were deleted for disallowance of expenditure incurred at a Business Centre, depreciation on premises, prior period expenses, disallowance under section 14A, and bad debts. The Tribunal emphasized the debatable nature of the issues, full disclosure by the assessee, and the absence of concealment or inaccurate particulars, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:48:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1357 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283269</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties under section 271(1)(c) in a case involving various disallowances. The penalties were deleted for disallowance of expenditure incurred at a Business Centre, depreciation on premises, prior period expenses, disallowance under section 14A, and bad debts. The Tribunal emphasized the debatable nature of the issues, full disclosure by the assessee, and the absence of concealment or inaccurate particulars, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>