https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385906 Writ jurisdiction was not invoked because section 26 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 provided an efficacious appellate remedy against the assessment order. The Court also held that the alleged breach of natural justice, including non-supply of a relied-upon report, could be examined by the appellate authority. In these circumstances, the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 was not considered appropriate, and writ relief was declined in favour of the statutory appeal process. en-us Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:28:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385906 Writ jurisdiction was not invoked because section 26 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 provided an efficacious appellate remedy against the assessment order. The Court also held that the alleged breach of natural justice, including non-supply of a relied-upon report, could be examined by the appellate authority. In these circumstances, the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 was not considered appropriate, and writ relief was declined in favour of the statutory appeal process. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385906