https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385906 The High Court of Bombay dismissed a petition challenging an order under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy under section 26 of the Act. The court criticized the petitioner's repeated adjournment requests, noting the delay caused. Despite arguments of breach of natural justice, the court found them belated and held that such issues could be addressed through the appellate process. The court stressed the importance of utilizing existing legal remedies rather than seeking extraordinary court intervention. en-us Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:28:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385906 The High Court of Bombay dismissed a petition challenging an order under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy under section 26 of the Act. The court criticized the petitioner's repeated adjournment requests, noting the delay caused. Despite arguments of breach of natural justice, the court found them belated and held that such issues could be addressed through the appellate process. The court stressed the importance of utilizing existing legal remedies rather than seeking extraordinary court intervention. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385906