<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 669 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385901</link>
    <description>The appeal by M/s. Gujarat State Fertilizers &amp;amp; Chemicals Limited was allowed by the Tribunal. The demand under Rule 3(5A) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and Section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1985, was set aside. The Tribunal emphasized the requirement for the Revenue to prove that Cenvat credit was availed on capital goods cleared as waste and scrap and that goods must meet the criteria of being produced or manufactured in India to be considered excisable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:27:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 669 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385901</link>
      <description>The appeal by M/s. Gujarat State Fertilizers &amp;amp; Chemicals Limited was allowed by the Tribunal. The demand under Rule 3(5A) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and Section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1985, was set aside. The Tribunal emphasized the requirement for the Revenue to prove that Cenvat credit was availed on capital goods cleared as waste and scrap and that goods must meet the criteria of being produced or manufactured in India to be considered excisable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>