https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283264 A testamentary direction requiring the defendant to manage property until demand did not make the beneficiary's personal return a condition precedent, and a valid demand for possession could be inferred from the suit itself and repeated requests made on the beneficiary's behalf. A foreign citizen's status, and an alleged contravention of foreign exchange law, did not by itself invalidate title or extinguish the right to recover possession, because the statute did not render such property rights void. On those findings, the concurrent decree for recovery of possession was upheld and the second appeal was dismissed. en-us Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:27:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283264 A testamentary direction requiring the defendant to manage property until demand did not make the beneficiary's personal return a condition precedent, and a valid demand for possession could be inferred from the suit itself and repeated requests made on the beneficiary's behalf. A foreign citizen's status, and an alleged contravention of foreign exchange law, did not by itself invalidate title or extinguish the right to recover possession, because the statute did not render such property rights void. On those findings, the concurrent decree for recovery of possession was upheld and the second appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283264