https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283262 The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the petitioner should utilize the statutory mechanism under the PML Act to address grievances. The court noted the importance of not entertaining writ petitions when an alternative remedy is available and highlighted the need for the petitioner to respond to the show-cause notice. The court refrained from expressing opinions on issues such as retrospective application of the PML Act and non-existence of proceeds of crime at the provisional attachment stage. en-us Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:23:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283262 The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the petitioner should utilize the statutory mechanism under the PML Act to address grievances. The court noted the importance of not entertaining writ petitions when an alternative remedy is available and highlighted the need for the petitioner to respond to the show-cause notice. The court refrained from expressing opinions on issues such as retrospective application of the PML Act and non-existence of proceeds of crime at the provisional attachment stage. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283262