<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1642 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283251</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the deletion of an addition of Rs. 48,20,118 made under section 40A(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 2011-12. The Tribunal ruled that the disallowance was related to income, not expenses, and therefore, the provisions of the section were not applicable. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, emphasizing the distinction between disallowance of expenses and income aspects, ultimately favoring the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:16:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1642 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283251</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the deletion of an addition of Rs. 48,20,118 made under section 40A(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 2011-12. The Tribunal ruled that the disallowance was related to income, not expenses, and therefore, the provisions of the section were not applicable. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, emphasizing the distinction between disallowance of expenses and income aspects, ultimately favoring the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>