<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1280 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283250</link>
    <description>A primary agricultural credit society is not covered by the exclusion in section 80P(4), which applies to co-operative banks; deduction under section 80P was therefore allowed. A provision for bad debts was not deductible because the amount had not been written off in the books as irrecoverable, and a mere provision does not satisfy the statutory requirement. The matter was otherwise remanded for fresh consideration on the remaining legal and connected issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:16:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1280 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283250</link>
      <description>A primary agricultural credit society is not covered by the exclusion in section 80P(4), which applies to co-operative banks; deduction under section 80P was therefore allowed. A provision for bad debts was not deductible because the amount had not been written off in the books as irrecoverable, and a mere provision does not satisfy the statutory requirement. The matter was otherwise remanded for fresh consideration on the remaining legal and connected issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>