<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1747 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283253</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 44,29,401/- made by the AO under Section 40A(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized that Section 40A(2)(b) applies to expenses, not income, and as the AO estimated the profit without questioning the expenses, the addition was deemed unjustified. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, citing consistent interpretation of Section 40A(2)(b) in previous judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:16:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1747 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283253</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 44,29,401/- made by the AO under Section 40A(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized that Section 40A(2)(b) applies to expenses, not income, and as the AO estimated the profit without questioning the expenses, the addition was deemed unjustified. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, citing consistent interpretation of Section 40A(2)(b) in previous judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>