<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 53 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19737</link>
    <description>Section 80G deduction was confined to cash donations, because section 80G(2)(a) was construed as referring only to a monetary contribution and not to a transfer of property or other donation in kind. The conflict among High Courts was settled by the Supreme Court, which held that donations made in kind do not qualify for deduction under the provision. Accordingly, the assessee was not entitled to deduction under section 80G for in-kind donations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:22:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 53 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19737</link>
      <description>Section 80G deduction was confined to cash donations, because section 80G(2)(a) was construed as referring only to a monetary contribution and not to a transfer of property or other donation in kind. The conflict among High Courts was settled by the Supreme Court, which held that donations made in kind do not qualify for deduction under the provision. Accordingly, the assessee was not entitled to deduction under section 80G for in-kind donations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>