<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 627 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385859</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, recognized the denial of deduction as a mistake apparent from the record rectifiable under Section 154, and directed the AO to re-compute the deduction under Section 80HHC in accordance with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Topman Exports. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:12:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 627 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385859</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, recognized the denial of deduction as a mistake apparent from the record rectifiable under Section 154, and directed the AO to re-compute the deduction under Section 80HHC in accordance with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Topman Exports. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>