https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385856 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions, dismissing the revenue's appeal. The infrastructure subsidy was treated as corpus donation, administrative expenses were allowed, and delayed Form 10 filings were accepted. The Tribunal found no infirmity in these decisions, citing precedents and relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. en-us Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385856 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions, dismissing the revenue's appeal. The infrastructure subsidy was treated as corpus donation, administrative expenses were allowed, and delayed Form 10 filings were accepted. The Tribunal found no infirmity in these decisions, citing precedents and relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385856