https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283249 The Tribunal dismissed M.Ps. 314 & 315/Bang/2017 concerning restoration to DRP or AO/TPO due to cryptic directions, citing not all cases require restoration to DRP. However, it allowed M.Ps. 316 & 317/Bang/2017 related to the exclusion of comparable companies in IT and ITES segments, rectifying discrepancies in the Tribunal order's findings. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of certain comparables based on Tribunal orders, clarifying the issues raised in the case. en-us Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 15 Sep 2019 09:40:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283249 The Tribunal dismissed M.Ps. 314 & 315/Bang/2017 concerning restoration to DRP or AO/TPO due to cryptic directions, citing not all cases require restoration to DRP. However, it allowed M.Ps. 316 & 317/Bang/2017 related to the exclusion of comparable companies in IT and ITES segments, rectifying discrepancies in the Tribunal order's findings. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of certain comparables based on Tribunal orders, clarifying the issues raised in the case. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283249