<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 585 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385817</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Impugned Order due to the lack of reasons provided and the failure to address legal issues raised by the Appellant. The matter was remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of considering all issues and applying independent legal analysis. The Adjudicating Authority was granted six months to decide the matter after hearing both sides, with the parties directed to appear for further directions. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:27:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 585 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385817</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Impugned Order due to the lack of reasons provided and the failure to address legal issues raised by the Appellant. The matter was remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of considering all issues and applying independent legal analysis. The Adjudicating Authority was granted six months to decide the matter after hearing both sides, with the parties directed to appear for further directions. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>