<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 581 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385813</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax on the rental of immovable property and the reversal of Cenvat credit on the construction of the compound wall and pipelines. However, the demand and penalties related to Tender and Plan Evaluation Fees and Finger Analysis Fees were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 581 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385813</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax on the rental of immovable property and the reversal of Cenvat credit on the construction of the compound wall and pipelines. However, the demand and penalties related to Tender and Plan Evaluation Fees and Finger Analysis Fees were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>