<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 579 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385811</link>
    <description>The appeal in this case was filed with a delay of 1475 days, seeking condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. However, as the demand amount fell below the monetary limit set by the Ministry of Finance, the appellant requested to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, leaving the question of law raised unresolved. The Tribunal allowed the appeal solely on the point of limitation, without addressing the merits of the case, including liability to pay duty, interest, and penalty. The invocation of the extended period of limitation was also questioned, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review beyond the limitation issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 579 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385811</link>
      <description>The appeal in this case was filed with a delay of 1475 days, seeking condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. However, as the demand amount fell below the monetary limit set by the Ministry of Finance, the appellant requested to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, leaving the question of law raised unresolved. The Tribunal allowed the appeal solely on the point of limitation, without addressing the merits of the case, including liability to pay duty, interest, and penalty. The invocation of the extended period of limitation was also questioned, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review beyond the limitation issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>