<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 577 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385809</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the department could not recover a refund once the order sanctioning it had attained finality without being challenged. The doctrine of unjust enrichment did not apply to cases of provisional assessment. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 577 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385809</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the department could not recover a refund once the order sanctioning it had attained finality without being challenged. The doctrine of unjust enrichment did not apply to cases of provisional assessment. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>