<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 574 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385806</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order estimating the central sales turnover at Rs. 30,00,000 for the assessment year 2000-01 in a case involving trading of hides and skins. The initial turnover disclosed was Rs. 3,02,400, which was raised to Rs. 40,00,000 by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal&#039;s enhancement lacked material evidence and reasoning, leading to the restoration of the first appeal authority&#039;s decision of estimating the turnover at Rs. 20,00,000. The burden of proof shifted to the assessee upon confrontation with disputed bill No. 113, ultimately resulting in a partial allowance of the revision in favor of the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:26:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 574 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385806</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order estimating the central sales turnover at Rs. 30,00,000 for the assessment year 2000-01 in a case involving trading of hides and skins. The initial turnover disclosed was Rs. 3,02,400, which was raised to Rs. 40,00,000 by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal&#039;s enhancement lacked material evidence and reasoning, leading to the restoration of the first appeal authority&#039;s decision of estimating the turnover at Rs. 20,00,000. The burden of proof shifted to the assessee upon confrontation with disputed bill No. 113, ultimately resulting in a partial allowance of the revision in favor of the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>