<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 567 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385799</link>
    <description>Statutory interest remained payable on delayed payment of a competition penalty even though the original penalty order was stayed during appeal. Regulation 5 of the Competition Commission of India (Manner of Recovery of Monetary Penalty) Regulations, 2011 permits simple interest where a demand notice is not paid within the stipulated time, and waiver or reduction is confined to specified circumstances. A stay only postpones enforcement; it does not extinguish the underlying penalty liability. Where the appellate forum ultimately upheld the contravention and merely reduced the penalty amount, the modified liability related back to the original order, and interest for the non-payment period was validly recoverable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:25:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 567 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385799</link>
      <description>Statutory interest remained payable on delayed payment of a competition penalty even though the original penalty order was stayed during appeal. Regulation 5 of the Competition Commission of India (Manner of Recovery of Monetary Penalty) Regulations, 2011 permits simple interest where a demand notice is not paid within the stipulated time, and waiver or reduction is confined to specified circumstances. A stay only postpones enforcement; it does not extinguish the underlying penalty liability. Where the appellate forum ultimately upheld the contravention and merely reduced the penalty amount, the modified liability related back to the original order, and interest for the non-payment period was validly recoverable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>