<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (2) TMI 126 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283242</link>
    <description>A murder conviction under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code cannot be sustained unless the evidence reliably proves that the accused inflicted the fatal injury. Here, the eye-witness, medical and seizure evidence did not satisfactorily connect the appellant to the deceased&#039;s head injury, so the murder finding was set aside. A plea of private defence based on alleged abduction also fails unless the alleged abduction or unlawful aggression is established on reliable evidence; the sister&#039;s alleged removal was not proved, so the defence was rejected. The conviction was therefore reduced to grievous hurt with common intention, while the lesser convictions were maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:21:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (2) TMI 126 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283242</link>
      <description>A murder conviction under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code cannot be sustained unless the evidence reliably proves that the accused inflicted the fatal injury. Here, the eye-witness, medical and seizure evidence did not satisfactorily connect the appellant to the deceased&#039;s head injury, so the murder finding was set aside. A plea of private defence based on alleged abduction also fails unless the alleged abduction or unlawful aggression is established on reliable evidence; the sister&#039;s alleged removal was not proved, so the defence was rejected. The conviction was therefore reduced to grievous hurt with common intention, while the lesser convictions were maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>