<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1364 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283229</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the assessees were allowed, and the penalties under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were deleted. The Tribunal found that the penalties imposed were not justified due to insufficient time provided for response and lack of evidence of non-cooperation by the assessee. Following precedents where penalties were deleted for similar reasons, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees. The penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) were deleted for all relevant years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1364 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283229</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the assessees were allowed, and the penalties under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were deleted. The Tribunal found that the penalties imposed were not justified due to insufficient time provided for response and lack of evidence of non-cooperation by the assessee. Following precedents where penalties were deleted for similar reasons, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees. The penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) were deleted for all relevant years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>