https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283236 The High Court held that the striking off of the petitioner company from the Register of Companies was procedurally flawed due to the absence of a mandatory order under Section 248(6) of the Companies Act, 2013. The Court exercised its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution to correct the error and directed the petitioner to take necessary steps. The civil revision petition was disposed of, emphasizing the Court's role in ensuring procedural compliance and justice. en-us Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Sep 2019 18:13:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283236 The High Court held that the striking off of the petitioner company from the Register of Companies was procedurally flawed due to the absence of a mandatory order under Section 248(6) of the Companies Act, 2013. The Court exercised its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution to correct the error and directed the petitioner to take necessary steps. The civil revision petition was disposed of, emphasizing the Court's role in ensuring procedural compliance and justice. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283236