<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 35 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19719</link>
    <description>A final Tribunal finding that an application under section 154 was maintainable could not be reopened through reference, because the proposed question no longer arose from the impugned order. Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act was treated as a doctrine of part performance giving defensive protection to a transferee in possession, not as an independent transfer of title. The later amendment to section 2(47) treating certain section 53A transactions as transfers was prospective, so it did not apply to the relevant assessment year. On that basis, the agreement to sell and possession arrangement were not a transfer under the unamended provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:57:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 35 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19719</link>
      <description>A final Tribunal finding that an application under section 154 was maintainable could not be reopened through reference, because the proposed question no longer arose from the impugned order. Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act was treated as a doctrine of part performance giving defensive protection to a transferee in possession, not as an independent transfer of title. The later amendment to section 2(47) treating certain section 53A transactions as transfers was prospective, so it did not apply to the relevant assessment year. On that basis, the agreement to sell and possession arrangement were not a transfer under the unamended provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>