https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283222 An emergency order under the Emergency Powers Ordinance was upheld despite service on the accused outside the district, because the empowering notification was read as authorising each District Magistrate within his district and any irregularity was waived when the accused accepted and obeyed the order without challenge; the Ordinance also prevented questioning the validity of such proceedings. The sentence for deliberate disobedience was not interfered with in superintendence, as interference was confined to illegality or a clear error of principle, and the Magistrate could consider deterrence and local conditions. The majority left the conviction and sentence undisturbed. en-us Wed, 20 Jul 1932 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:05:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283222 An emergency order under the Emergency Powers Ordinance was upheld despite service on the accused outside the district, because the empowering notification was read as authorising each District Magistrate within his district and any irregularity was waived when the accused accepted and obeyed the order without challenge; the Ordinance also prevented questioning the validity of such proceedings. The sentence for deliberate disobedience was not interfered with in superintendence, as interference was confined to illegality or a clear error of principle, and the Magistrate could consider deterrence and local conditions. The majority left the conviction and sentence undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Jul 1932 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283222