<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1935 (3) TMI 23 - HIGH COURT OF OUDH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283220</link>
    <description>Where the U.P. Municipalities Act provides an appeal against a municipal notice and makes the appellate order final, a criminal court trying disobedience of that notice cannot reopen its legality, validity, or reasonableness once the District Magistrate has upheld it. The only limited enquiry left to the criminal court is whether the impugned document is in truth a notice under the Act or a complete nullity. If it is a notice whose validity has been finally affirmed on appeal, the criminal court is bound by that determination. A dissenting view stated that the criminal court should itself examine whether the notice was lawfully issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 1935 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:14:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1935 (3) TMI 23 - HIGH COURT OF OUDH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283220</link>
      <description>Where the U.P. Municipalities Act provides an appeal against a municipal notice and makes the appellate order final, a criminal court trying disobedience of that notice cannot reopen its legality, validity, or reasonableness once the District Magistrate has upheld it. The only limited enquiry left to the criminal court is whether the impugned document is in truth a notice under the Act or a complete nullity. If it is a notice whose validity has been finally affirmed on appeal, the criminal court is bound by that determination. A dissenting view stated that the criminal court should itself examine whether the notice was lawfully issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 1935 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>