https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385788 Where the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary threshold, a departmental appeal will not be entertained merely because the dispute arose in writ jurisdiction and the assessee had no alternative statutory remedy under the Income-tax Act. The Karnataka High Court rejected the Revenue's reliance on a circular excluding writ matters from the monetary limit policy, holding that the Department could not use the absence of an alternative appeal remedy to bypass the threshold. The appeal was not entertained on merits and was dismissed, leaving the impugned order undisturbed. en-us Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:00:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385788 Where the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary threshold, a departmental appeal will not be entertained merely because the dispute arose in writ jurisdiction and the assessee had no alternative statutory remedy under the Income-tax Act. The Karnataka High Court rejected the Revenue's reliance on a circular excluding writ matters from the monetary limit policy, holding that the Department could not use the absence of an alternative appeal remedy to bypass the threshold. The appeal was not entertained on merits and was dismissed, leaving the impugned order undisturbed. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385788