<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 555 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385787</link>
    <description>The court found the Warrant of Arrest procedurally ultra-vires as it did not comply with the requirements of Rule 73(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court quashed the warrant, ordering the immediate release of the petitioner upon depositing the Passport before the Recovery Officer. Respondent No.1 was permitted to take further legal action if advised. The pending interlocutory application was dismissed, and the writ petition was disposed of, concluding the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 07:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 555 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385787</link>
      <description>The court found the Warrant of Arrest procedurally ultra-vires as it did not comply with the requirements of Rule 73(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court quashed the warrant, ordering the immediate release of the petitioner upon depositing the Passport before the Recovery Officer. Respondent No.1 was permitted to take further legal action if advised. The pending interlocutory application was dismissed, and the writ petition was disposed of, concluding the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>