<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 535 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385767</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the civil revision petition, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy through the NCLAT. The court highlighted the importance of utilizing statutory appellate mechanisms under the Companies Act, 2013, and refrained from delving into the case&#039;s merits. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 535 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385767</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the civil revision petition, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy through the NCLAT. The court highlighted the importance of utilizing statutory appellate mechanisms under the Companies Act, 2013, and refrained from delving into the case&#039;s merits. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>