<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 531 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385763</link>
    <description>Reimbursed expenditure towards godown rent, damage allowance, loading charges and demurrage charges was held not includible in the taxable value of C&amp;F Agent service for the relevant period. The applicable valuation principle was that only the gross amount charged as consideration for the taxable service forms part of assessable value, while amounts incurred in the course of providing the service but not paid as quid pro quo are excluded. The later amendment including reimbursable expenditure was treated as a prospective change, confirming that such reimbursements were outside the pre-amendment value base. Service tax demand on these reimbursements was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 05:58:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 531 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385763</link>
      <description>Reimbursed expenditure towards godown rent, damage allowance, loading charges and demurrage charges was held not includible in the taxable value of C&amp;F Agent service for the relevant period. The applicable valuation principle was that only the gross amount charged as consideration for the taxable service forms part of assessable value, while amounts incurred in the course of providing the service but not paid as quid pro quo are excluded. The later amendment including reimbursable expenditure was treated as a prospective change, confirming that such reimbursements were outside the pre-amendment value base. Service tax demand on these reimbursements was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>