<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court denies petitioner&#039;s request for refund of extra deposit, citing no change in circumstances under Article 226.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49249</link>
    <description>Refund of extra amount deposited during the pendency of appellate proceedings - petitioner claims that entire burden has been born but it only - anthis Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution ought not to revisit the very same circumstances and grant the prayers as made. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 05:53:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 05:53:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court denies petitioner&#039;s request for refund of extra deposit, citing no change in circumstances under Article 226.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49249</link>
      <description>Refund of extra amount deposited during the pendency of appellate proceedings - petitioner claims that entire burden has been born but it only - anthis Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution ought not to revisit the very same circumstances and grant the prayers as made. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 05:53:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>