https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385759 A refund of excess VAT was denied because the Supreme Court had already conclusively decided the underlying entitlement issue and had expressly rejected applications seeking clarification or modification. The High Court held that, in writ jurisdiction, it could not reopen the same factual basis, enlarge the scope of the Supreme Court's final judgment, or grant a refund inconsistent with that adjudication. The impugned communication merely reflected the final position already settled by the Supreme Court. en-us Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Sep 2019 18:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385759 A refund of excess VAT was denied because the Supreme Court had already conclusively decided the underlying entitlement issue and had expressly rejected applications seeking clarification or modification. The High Court held that, in writ jurisdiction, it could not reopen the same factual basis, enlarge the scope of the Supreme Court's final judgment, or grant a refund inconsistent with that adjudication. The impugned communication merely reflected the final position already settled by the Supreme Court. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385759