https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385757 The court set aside Ext.P8 and remanded the matter for reconsideration due to valid objections raised by the petitioner regarding double taxation. The petitioner was directed to provide additional details, and the disputed amount was to be reexamined by the second respondent. The petitioner retained the right to pursue further legal remedies if unsatisfied. The writ petition was disposed of, concluding the challenge against the orders. en-us Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Sep 2019 05:53:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385757 The court set aside Ext.P8 and remanded the matter for reconsideration due to valid objections raised by the petitioner regarding double taxation. The petitioner was directed to provide additional details, and the disputed amount was to be reexamined by the second respondent. The petitioner retained the right to pursue further legal remedies if unsatisfied. The writ petition was disposed of, concluding the challenge against the orders. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385757