<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1849 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283215</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the Court exercised its discretionary appellate jurisdiction to decline interference with the impugned order because the revenue involved was de minimis. The small amount in dispute was treated as the determinative consideration, and the special leave petition was dismissed without disturbing the lower order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 17:40:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1849 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283215</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the Court exercised its discretionary appellate jurisdiction to decline interference with the impugned order because the revenue involved was de minimis. The small amount in dispute was treated as the determinative consideration, and the special leave petition was dismissed without disturbing the lower order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>