<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1393 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283217</link>
    <description>Section 153C confers jurisdiction only after the Assessing Officer of the searched person first records satisfaction that seized money, books, documents or assets belong to or relate to another person, and then hands over that material for separate assessment. That precondition remains mandatory even where the same officer assesses both persons. Applying Calcutta Knitwears and the CBDT circular, the text notes that an order-sheet entry in the assessee&#039;s file before notice did not satisfy the required prior satisfaction in the searched person&#039;s case. The assessment under section 143(3) read with section 153C was therefore invalid and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 17:40:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1393 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283217</link>
      <description>Section 153C confers jurisdiction only after the Assessing Officer of the searched person first records satisfaction that seized money, books, documents or assets belong to or relate to another person, and then hands over that material for separate assessment. That precondition remains mandatory even where the same officer assesses both persons. Applying Calcutta Knitwears and the CBDT circular, the text notes that an order-sheet entry in the assessee&#039;s file before notice did not satisfy the required prior satisfaction in the searched person&#039;s case. The assessment under section 143(3) read with section 153C was therefore invalid and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>