https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283202 A complaint under the Railways Act challenged freight charged on an inflated distance and sought charges to be levied on the actual distance. The note explains that the Tribunal could mould interim and final relief under its statutory powers, and that civil procedure principles on pleadings and relief allow specific and general relief to be shaped by the substance of the claim. It also states that declaratory and ancillary relief is discretionary, and that delay in constituting the Tribunal did not by itself justify retrospective relief. The Tribunal's choice to limit relief to the date of judgment was treated as a just and equitable exercise of discretion. en-us Thu, 16 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Sep 2019 15:29:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283202 A complaint under the Railways Act challenged freight charged on an inflated distance and sought charges to be levied on the actual distance. The note explains that the Tribunal could mould interim and final relief under its statutory powers, and that civil procedure principles on pleadings and relief allow specific and general relief to be shaped by the substance of the claim. It also states that declaratory and ancillary relief is discretionary, and that delay in constituting the Tribunal did not by itself justify retrospective relief. The Tribunal's choice to limit relief to the date of judgment was treated as a just and equitable exercise of discretion. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 16 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283202