<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 864 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283200</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,10,856, concluding that the amount was a capital receipt and not taxable as income of the estate under Section 168. The Tribunal also clarified that Section 176(4) could not be invoked to include the amount in the estate&#039;s assessment and emphasized the need to assess such receipts in the hands of the recipient under the appropriate provision. The appeal by the Department was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:57:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 864 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283200</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,10,856, concluding that the amount was a capital receipt and not taxable as income of the estate under Section 168. The Tribunal also clarified that Section 176(4) could not be invoked to include the amount in the estate&#039;s assessment and emphasized the need to assess such receipts in the hands of the recipient under the appropriate provision. The appeal by the Department was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>