https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283190 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the respondent's jurisdiction to issue proceedings, ruling that the petitioner must pursue the statutory appellate remedy before the Commissioner (Appeals). The court found that the impugned order was issued correctly and without jurisdictional error, emphasizing that the issue of whether the petitioner's activities constitute manufacturing should be decided by the First Appellate Authority. The court concluded that the petitioner's contentions can be addressed through the appeal process and granted the petitioner the liberty to file an appeal within four weeks, without awarding costs. en-us Fri, 09 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:10:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283190 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the respondent's jurisdiction to issue proceedings, ruling that the petitioner must pursue the statutory appellate remedy before the Commissioner (Appeals). The court found that the impugned order was issued correctly and without jurisdictional error, emphasizing that the issue of whether the petitioner's activities constitute manufacturing should be decided by the First Appellate Authority. The court concluded that the petitioner's contentions can be addressed through the appeal process and granted the petitioner the liberty to file an appeal within four weeks, without awarding costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 09 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283190