<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1878 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283189</link>
    <description>A writ petition seeking reopening of the common portal to permit filing of Tran-1 was not decided on fresh merits. The High Court noted that the same issue had already been addressed in an earlier common order, under which petitioners were given liberty to file a representation before the I.T. Redressal Committee. Following that course, the petition was disposed of in line with the earlier order, so the petitioner received the same procedural remedy rather than a direct direction to reopen the portal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1878 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283189</link>
      <description>A writ petition seeking reopening of the common portal to permit filing of Tran-1 was not decided on fresh merits. The High Court noted that the same issue had already been addressed in an earlier common order, under which petitioners were given liberty to file a representation before the I.T. Redressal Committee. Following that course, the petition was disposed of in line with the earlier order, so the petitioner received the same procedural remedy rather than a direct direction to reopen the portal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>