<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1691 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283187</link>
    <description>Revenue appeals were dismissed for low tax effect because the tax effect fell below the revised monetary limit of Rs. 20 lakhs under CBDT Circular No. 3/2018. The circular was treated as applicable retrospectively to pending appeals, so the matters did not require adjudication on merits. The dismissal was expressly not an affirmation of the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on the merits, and the question of law was left open for an appropriate case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:10:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1691 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283187</link>
      <description>Revenue appeals were dismissed for low tax effect because the tax effect fell below the revised monetary limit of Rs. 20 lakhs under CBDT Circular No. 3/2018. The circular was treated as applicable retrospectively to pending appeals, so the matters did not require adjudication on merits. The dismissal was expressly not an affirmation of the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on the merits, and the question of law was left open for an appropriate case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>