<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 508 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385740</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking to quash a recovery notice issued by the Garrison Engineer regarding GST deposit for completed work. The petitioner, a Government contractor, did not contest the liability for the GST deposit, leading to the court&#039;s decision to reject the petition. The court emphasized the importance of fulfilling tax obligations and ruled that there were no legal grounds to support the request for an installment schedule for the GST deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 17:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 508 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385740</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking to quash a recovery notice issued by the Garrison Engineer regarding GST deposit for completed work. The petitioner, a Government contractor, did not contest the liability for the GST deposit, leading to the court&#039;s decision to reject the petition. The court emphasized the importance of fulfilling tax obligations and ruled that there were no legal grounds to support the request for an installment schedule for the GST deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>