https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385735 The Court found that due to the lack of notice served on the respondent in the appeal, justice would be best served by recalling the judgment dated 12.02.2018. The Court ordered the recall of the judgment, disposed of the miscellaneous application, and directed the appeal to be listed for further consideration. The respondent was instructed to file a counter affidavit within three weeks, with a provision for a rejoinder to be filed within three weeks thereafter. The appeal was scheduled to proceed after six weeks to ensure all parties have the opportunity to present their arguments effectively. en-us Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jul 2026 11:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385735 The Court found that due to the lack of notice served on the respondent in the appeal, justice would be best served by recalling the judgment dated 12.02.2018. The Court ordered the recall of the judgment, disposed of the miscellaneous application, and directed the appeal to be listed for further consideration. The respondent was instructed to file a counter affidavit within three weeks, with a provision for a rejoinder to be filed within three weeks thereafter. The appeal was scheduled to proceed after six weeks to ensure all parties have the opportunity to present their arguments effectively. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385735