<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 493 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385725</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on penalty expenditure, interest income classification, Frequent Flyer Programme provision, and excess provision for obsolescence. The issue of disputed bills was sent back to the AO for further verification. The Tribunal also decided against the applicability of Section 14A to dividend income due to the absence of exempt income. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2019 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 493 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385725</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on penalty expenditure, interest income classification, Frequent Flyer Programme provision, and excess provision for obsolescence. The issue of disputed bills was sent back to the AO for further verification. The Tribunal also decided against the applicability of Section 14A to dividend income due to the absence of exempt income. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>