https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385710 The High Court directed the petitioners, two sister concerns in the export business, to file appeals before CESTAT, Chandigarh, within one month to address issues raised in their challenge against the Order-in-Appeal dismissing their appeal. The Court acknowledged potential forgery in the Market Inquiry Report but deemed it inappropriate to decide under Article 226 jurisdiction. The petitioners were given six months for CESTAT to address all raised issues without considering limitations, without expressing any opinion on the case's merits. en-us Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385710 The High Court directed the petitioners, two sister concerns in the export business, to file appeals before CESTAT, Chandigarh, within one month to address issues raised in their challenge against the Order-in-Appeal dismissing their appeal. The Court acknowledged potential forgery in the Market Inquiry Report but deemed it inappropriate to decide under Article 226 jurisdiction. The petitioners were given six months for CESTAT to address all raised issues without considering limitations, without expressing any opinion on the case's merits. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385710