https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385708 The HC disposed of the petition, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures and statutory remedies. It declined to entertain the challenge to the order dated 18.12.2018, as the petitioner had already appealed the assessment order. The court reiterated that grievances regarding alleged contempt could be pursued through separate legal proceedings. It directed the CIT (Appeals) to address the pending appeal per the law, affirming that previous judgments provided binding guidelines for tax evasion complaints. The court did not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's submissions, underscoring the importance of compliance with established legal frameworks. en-us Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Nov 2024 15:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385708 The HC disposed of the petition, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures and statutory remedies. It declined to entertain the challenge to the order dated 18.12.2018, as the petitioner had already appealed the assessment order. The court reiterated that grievances regarding alleged contempt could be pursued through separate legal proceedings. It directed the CIT (Appeals) to address the pending appeal per the law, affirming that previous judgments provided binding guidelines for tax evasion complaints. The court did not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's submissions, underscoring the importance of compliance with established legal frameworks. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385708