<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 470 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385702</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for further examination. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the appellant&#039;s claim regarding the eligibility of credit for service tax paid on Outward Transportation of Goods. The adjudicating authority was directed to determine the place of removal and assess relevant precedents before making a decision. The appeals were allowed for a fresh consideration based on specific directions provided by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:52:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 470 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385702</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for further examination. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the appellant&#039;s claim regarding the eligibility of credit for service tax paid on Outward Transportation of Goods. The adjudicating authority was directed to determine the place of removal and assess relevant precedents before making a decision. The appeals were allowed for a fresh consideration based on specific directions provided by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>