<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 464 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385696</link>
    <description>A service tax demand based on an audit objection already settled by the department was held unsustainable and time-barred, so it could not survive on the same objection. The agreement was construed as involving supply of material along with erection, commissioning and installation service, bringing the appellant within the benefit of the relevant exemption notifications. As the tax demand failed, the proposed penalty also did not survive. The impugned order was set aside and the appellant obtained consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 20:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 464 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385696</link>
      <description>A service tax demand based on an audit objection already settled by the department was held unsustainable and time-barred, so it could not survive on the same objection. The agreement was construed as involving supply of material along with erection, commissioning and installation service, bringing the appellant within the benefit of the relevant exemption notifications. As the tax demand failed, the proposed penalty also did not survive. The impugned order was set aside and the appellant obtained consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>