<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 12 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19688</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application under section 254(2) regarding the allowability of commission, emphasizing the need to consider each assessment year separately. It highlighted that disagreement with the Tribunal&#039;s decision does not automatically warrant rectification unless there is a clear mistake on the face of the record. The judgment underscored the importance of following proper legal procedures to challenge original orders rather than seeking rectification based on disagreement with the Tribunal&#039;s conclusions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:18:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 12 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19688</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application under section 254(2) regarding the allowability of commission, emphasizing the need to consider each assessment year separately. It highlighted that disagreement with the Tribunal&#039;s decision does not automatically warrant rectification unless there is a clear mistake on the face of the record. The judgment underscored the importance of following proper legal procedures to challenge original orders rather than seeking rectification based on disagreement with the Tribunal&#039;s conclusions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>