<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1617 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283174</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of the appeal due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit deadline set by the High Court. Despite the applicant fulfilling the pre-deposit amount after the specified timeframe, the Tribunal held that it lacked jurisdiction to extend the deadline and advised the applicant to seek relief from the High Court if needed. Compliance with court orders within stipulated timeframes was emphasized, underscoring the Tribunal&#039;s limited jurisdiction in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:09:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1617 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283174</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of the appeal due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit deadline set by the High Court. Despite the applicant fulfilling the pre-deposit amount after the specified timeframe, the Tribunal held that it lacked jurisdiction to extend the deadline and advised the applicant to seek relief from the High Court if needed. Compliance with court orders within stipulated timeframes was emphasized, underscoring the Tribunal&#039;s limited jurisdiction in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>